Skip to content

Category: Theology

Baptized Into Christ, Not a Brand: Why Your Denominational Label is Just the Glass, Not the Sun

(Photo by Sándor Skoda from Pexels: https://www.pexels.com/photo/stunning-gothic-cathedral-interior-with-stained-glass-33419138/)

The word that keeps resurfacing as I reflect on the state of contemporary Christianity is shades. To me, it feels like a paint store with too many shades and not enough windows. Visit a few churches, browse denominational websites, or scan the congregations of any modern city, and the pattern becomes unmistakable. Christianity has splintered into hues — theological, liturgical, cultural, political, — that were originally meant to function as windows through which the light of Christ shines. Too often, however, those windows have hardened into opaque walls.

Many Christians have been trained to introduce themselves by their label first: Baptist. Anglican. Pentecostal. Reformed. Lutheran. Catholic. The label precedes the confession.

But what if that order is precisely the problem?

Baptism as a Transfer of Citizenship

Ask a Christian what happened at their baptism, and the answers frequently orbit around a local congregation, a pastor, or a denominational tradition. These answers are not entirely wrong — but they are incomplete in a way that matters enormously.

The Apostle Paul speaks of baptism in far more expansive terms:

“For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ” (Galatians 3:27, ESV).

Baptism does not merely induct believers into an ecclesial structure. It unites them to a Person. And in being joined to Christ, believers are simultaneously joined to all who belong to Him — across time and place and every cultural expression of the faith.

Baptism is not a club membership. It is a transfer of citizenship. Emerging from the waters, the Christian does not join a franchise but enters a kingdom. We become part of the Corpus Christi, the Body of Christ, i.e., a communion that transcends geography, ethnicity, language, century, and skin tones. Baptism is less a membership card and more a passport into a reality far older and wider than any single tradition can contain.

The Problem of Tribal Christianity

Yet Christians rarely live as citizens of that kingdom. Too often, congregations and denominations become the entire horizon of Christian identity. Those outside one’s theological “shade” are treated not as fellow heirs of grace, but as strangers, rivals, or competitors for doctrinal legitimacy.

I’m not arguing against rootedness. Root matter as C.S. Lewis, in Mere Christianity, famously described Christianity as a great hall with many rooms branching from it. The hall represents the core of the faith, while the rooms symbolize the particular traditions in which believers worship, pray, and serve. Lewis rightly observed that one cannot permanently live in the hallway; one needs a room — a concrete community and a spiritual home.¹

Yet there is a profound difference between inhabiting a room and mistaking the room for the whole house. When denominational identity becomes primary, Christians confuse the filter for the light itself. The color of the stained glass begins to eclipse the sun shining through it.

What the Early Church Knew

The early church understood this with far greater clarity than many modern Christians do.

On his way to martyrdom in the early second century, Ignatius of Antioch wrote plainly:

“Wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church.”²

Ignatius was not speaking of a narrowly institutional structure in the modern sense. His concern was the universal presence of Christ among His people, a reality that could not be confined to a nation, a city, a bishop, an ethnicity, or a liturgical style.

Similarly, Cyril of Jerusalem instructed fourth-century catechumens that the term catholic meant “universal”— a church spread throughout the whole world, embracing every kind of person.³ Baptism united believers not merely to a local assembly, but to this worldwide communion of saints stretching backward and forward through time.

The early church inherited something immense and majestic. Over the centuries, that magnificent inheritance was too often reduced to brands, tribes, skin tones, style of worship, and competing subcultures.

Unity Without Relativism

Before anyone accuses this of being a warm bath of theological mush — let me be clear. This is not a call to believe anything, as long as we use the word ‘Jesus’ and smile at each other. The Body of Christ is held together by what the church has historically called the depositum fidei — the deposit of faith handed down from the apostles. The Trinity. The Incarnation. The atoning death and bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. Salvation by grace through faith. These are not the “shades” Christians quarrel over; they are the white light that makes every legitimate shade possible. They constitute the grammar of Christian faith itself, and without them, the language becomes confusing. Church historian Jaroslav Pelikan captured it best:

“Tradition is the living faith of the dead; traditionalism is the dead faith of the living.”⁴

True catholicity preserves the apostolic faith with living hands. It allows the faith to breathe afresh in every generation rather than embalming it in rigid tribalism or denominational nostalgia. As St. Vincent of Lérins said, the test of genuine Christian unity is never doctrinal minimalism — it is fidelity to what has been believed everywhere, always, and by all.

Learning to See the Whole Body

Recovering this vision requires a fundamentally different posture toward fellow Christians.

It requires believers to stop guarding their shades and start recognizing the Body. When encountering a Christian from another tradition — a Coptic believer in Egypt, a Brazilian Pentecostal, a Benedictine monk, an Orthodox priest, a silent Quaker — the first instinct should not be to catalogue differences, but to recognize someone marked by the same baptism and claimed by the same Lord.

Such recognition requires real humility: the humility to learn from traditions one does not fully understand, and the courage to stand beside Christians who differ on secondary matters while remaining united in Christ.

In the words of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, “Christian community is not an ideal which we must realize; it is rather a reality created by God in Christ in which we may participate.”⁵

Christian community exists through Jesus Christ and in Jesus Christ. If He remains at the center, the church remains truly the Body. If He is displaced by our ideology, tribalism, or cultural preference, the community becomes something else, whatever Christian vocabulary it continues to use.

The Table Already Set

I keep coming back to the image of a table. Not a table divided by denominational seating charts — Baptists here, Catholics there, Pentecostals in the corner, Orthodox at another end — but a table where the decisive question is not denominational affiliation, but whether one bows before the crucified and risen Christ.

My baptism was not a ticket into a religious club. It was an invitation to that table — a feast already prepared and already populated by saints across centuries, languages, and traditions. The tragedy is how often Christians argue about the seating arrangements instead of rejoicing in the meal itself.

We were not baptized into a denomination. We were baptized into a Person.

His Body is larger, older, and more glorious than the imagination of any tradition. The cord that binds Christians together is not identical liturgy, shared political alignment, or uniformity on every secondary doctrine. It is the unbreakable confession that Jesus Christ is Lord — crucified, risen, reigning, and returning. That cord is strong enough. That cord has held martyrs and mystics, reformers and contemplatives, house churches in Asia and Iran and ancient liturgies in Ethiopia. It’ll hold us too, if we stop trying to braid something smaller over it.


Where have you seen the ‘white light’ shine through a different ‘stained glass’ window? Tell us below.


References

  1. Lewis, C.S. Mere Christianity. New York: HarperOne, 2001, Preface.
  2. Ignatius of Antioch. Letter to the Smyrnaeans 8:2.
  3. Cyril of Jerusalem. Catechetical Lectures XVIII.23.
  4. Pelikan, Jaroslav. The Vindication of Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.
  5. Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Life Together. New York: Harper & Row, 1954.
Leave a Comment

Biblical Illiteracy, Christian Nationalism, and “Donald J. Trump, the Son of Man—The Christ”

In my past thirty years or so of studying and working with Asian, African, and Western theologies and theologians, I have often noticed one thread. Whenever we discuss theologies from the so-called “third world” or “developing” nations, I have often felt many of my western friends quickly want to warn us non-westerners about the lurking dangers of syncretism and potential heresies in the theologization emerging in the majority world. They also raise questions about the lack of discipleship or the shallowness of the faith of new believers who have come to the Kingdom of God as a result of some incredible Christward movements witnessed among various people groups. However, as is often the case, we get our blinders on when looking at our culture, Christianity, and the status of discipleship.

Here’s an example of how blinders often work. Christian nationalism, which is a misnomer in itself, has led many in the west and particularly in the USA to believe that a politician is not only a savior from their political, social, and economic mess, but also a God-sent religious savior, an avatar or an incarnation of God! You may brush it aside as a fringe element and go your way, satisfied that your Christian country can never engage in such a heretical thought. However, you will do so at your own peril. At a time when, a scientific survey by the Pew Research Center predicts a continuous decline, one cannot ignore why the faith is evaporating in the west:

“If recent trends in religious switching continue, Christians could make up less than half of the U.S. population within a few decades…U.S. ‘nones’ will approach majority by 2070 if recent switching tends continue,”

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/09/13/modeling-the-future-of-religion-in-america/

A book has recently been published, crystallizing this belief in a politician as the religious savior that people have been looking for, that is replete with biblical citations to justify their wild theological claims. The title is: President Donald J. Trump, The Son of Man—The Christ. Yes, you read that right, and no, the author claims it is not a satire!

Donald J. Trump Son of Man the Christ
Donald J. Trump Son of Man the Christ

Of course, you do not have to be a theologian to recognize it as a heresy, as no educated Christian who has been discipled well would agree with the statements of its author of South African origin, Helgard Müller, that the “son of man” in the Bible is now incarnated in Donald J. Trump. The author, who is basically trying to make a quick buck, argues that there are two Christs – the son of man and the son of God, with Jesus being the son of God who was betrayed by Judas and Trump being the son of man who was betrayed by Mike Pence. Müller will indeed make more than a quick buck (even the kindle version is US $19!) as he knows it too well that millions of Christians who are biblical illiterates would buy anything that glorifies their political hero and justifies it with “biblical prophesies,” which cannot be located in the Bible if one takes the trouble of opening and reading it. That is why Müller has been going to all the rallies of Trump with his trailer and signs, enthusiastically marketing this book and personally handing out or mailing free copies to social influencers such as Candace Owens (see Muller’s Facebook page).

Candace Owens

Maybe the publication of such books will help us see our own cultural and theological blinders and take our responsibility for discipleship more seriously than we have done in the past.

1 Comment

The youngest theologian I ever heard!

The youngest theologian that I ever heard!

No words of explanation are needed. Just listen to this young theologian speak her heart out and let’s ponder on what she believes and the way she articulates her faith. May God bless her abundantly. May you and I have a faith like hers. Amen.

“At that time the disciples came to Jesus and said, “Who then is greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” And He called a child to Himself and set him before them, and said, “Truly I say to you, unless you are converted and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever then humbles himself as this child, he is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 18: 1-4 NASB)

Leave a Comment

You have successfully subscribed to our blog. Thank you!

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

You agree to receive posts and updates from this site through the above email Id.